Next.js
Full-stack React framework with routing, SSR and API routes
Category: React meta-framework
Best for: React teams building production web apps, SaaS dashboards
Overall rating: 4.8/5
Power: 4.9/5 · Ease: 4.0/5
Price: Free
Next.js vs Remix – Which is better for your next project?
Choosing between Next.js and Remix? This comparison breaks down their strengths, trade-offs, and ideal use cases so you can decide faster.
Quick verdict
For most teams, Next.js is the safer default. However, Remix can be a better fit if you lean into its specific strengths.
Remix
Full-stack web framework with nested routes and web-standard APIs
Category: Full-stack framework
Best for: Teams who like web standards and full-stack TypeScript apps
Overall rating: 4.3/5
Power: 4.6/5 · Ease: 4.0/5
Price: Free
Side-by-side comparison
| Aspect | Next.js | Remix |
|---|---|---|
| Category | React meta-framework | Full-stack framework |
| Typical use cases | React teams building production web apps, SaaS dashboards | Teams who like web standards and full-stack TypeScript apps |
| Power / flexibility | 4.9/5 | 4.6/5 |
| Ease of learning | 4.0/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Price | Free | Free |
Pros & cons of Next.js
Pros
- Server-side rendering
- File-based routing
- Huge ecosystem
Cons
- Strongly tied to React
- Can feel complex for small sites
Pros & cons of Remix
Pros
- Embraces web standards
- Great routing model
- Good performance
Cons
- Smaller ecosystem
- Less mainstream than Next.js
Which should you choose?
Pick Next.js if you align with its ideal profile: React teams building production web apps, SaaS dashboards. Choose Remix if you align more with: Teams who like web standards and full-stack TypeScript apps.