Next.js
Full-stack React framework with routing, SSR and API routes
Category: React meta-framework
Best for: React teams building production web apps, SaaS dashboards
Overall rating: 4.8/5
Power: 4.9/5 · Ease: 4.0/5
Price: Free
Next.js vs Astro – Which is better for your next project?
Choosing between Next.js and Astro? This comparison breaks down their strengths, trade-offs, and ideal use cases so you can decide faster.
Quick verdict
For most teams, Next.js is the safer default. However, Astro can be a better fit if you lean into its specific strengths.
Astro
Content-focused framework with island architecture
Category: Meta-framework
Best for: Content-heavy sites, blogs, marketing pages with some interactivity
Overall rating: 4.6/5
Power: 4.7/5 · Ease: 4.4/5
Price: Free
Side-by-side comparison
| Aspect | Next.js | Astro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | React meta-framework | Meta-framework |
| Typical use cases | React teams building production web apps, SaaS dashboards | Content-heavy sites, blogs, marketing pages with some interactivity |
| Power / flexibility | 4.9/5 | 4.7/5 |
| Ease of learning | 4.0/5 | 4.4/5 |
| Price | Free | Free |
Pros & cons of Next.js
Pros
- Server-side rendering
- File-based routing
- Huge ecosystem
Cons
- Strongly tied to React
- Can feel complex for small sites
Pros & cons of Astro
Pros
- Very fast by default
- Great for content sites
- Framework-agnostic components
Cons
- Less suited to very heavy interactive apps
- Smaller ecosystem
Which should you choose?
Pick Next.js if you align with its ideal profile: React teams building production web apps, SaaS dashboards. Choose Astro if you align more with: Content-heavy sites, blogs, marketing pages with some interactivity.